--Well, Sandra Byrd has done it again. I fell in love with her writing when I read her first book in the "French Twist" series, Let Them Eat Cake. Over the weekend I devoured--or should I say "savored"?--the second book, Bon Appetit.
After I interviewed Sandra in October 2007, I blogged:
While I've enjoyed some Christian "chick lit" lately, some of it can veer into the self-consciously cute and trying a little too hard to be funny zone. Not this book. Sandra Byrd's humor is wryly amusing instead of broadly slapstick, her protagonist's interaction with God believable instead of goofy.
And indeed, Sandra told me her books don't fit neatly into the "chick lit" category:
Bon Appetit is another treat, continuing the story of pastry-baker Lexi Stuart. Since the subject matter demands food puns, I'd have to say that Bon Appetit is light and sweet, but definitely substantial enough to satisfy...and yet leave you hungry for a little more. And we'll get that with Piece de Resistance, the third book in the series.
By the way, I am going to try to snag another interview with Ms. Byrd. Oh--and my 21-year-old daughter LOVED both of these books.
A little disappointed with "Heroes"
Senhil Ramamurthy as Mohinder Suresh
Heroes has never been my favorite current TV show--that honor would have to go to "Lost"--but I've always found it entertaining and engrossing.
However, after last week's fall debut, I have to admit to being a bit disappointed and even a little disturbed.
First of all, my favorite characters--the ones we have relied on to be honorable and good--are acting in ways I don't like. The character of Peter Petrelli (Milo Ventimiglia) is much darker this season, at least so far. And what's with Mohinder Suresh (Sendhil Ramamurthy)? From what we know of his character, he would NEVER behave in the way he's behaving in the first episode. Suresh is usually, like, the voice of reason.
Another disturbing element is the way religion is being introduced into the storyline of Nathan Petrelli. Sorry, but I don't trust a hit TV show to portray religion in a reasonable way, and Nathan's religious obsession, so far, is just looking weird to me. And what was all that about "a beast stalking toward Bethlehem" in Suresh's narration?
UPDATE: OK, I apparently revealed my appalling ignorance about poetry with that last sentence. I've been informed that the line about "the rough beast slouching [not "stalking"] toward Bethlehem" is actually from a poem by W. B. Yeats...which, like that episode of "Heroes," was titled "The Second Coming." Apparently it's about the dangers facing modern man. Mmm, yes, I'm feeling a little dumb right now. :)
The show has always contained quite a bit of violence, but it's looking even more violent and dark than ever. As fascinated and intrigued as I am with the story and the characters, is this something I want to dwell on-- even for an hour a week? I'm just not sure.
If you're a Heroes fan, I'd love to hear your viewpoint. Do let me know in my comments section.
3 comments:
I think the problem with Heroes is that there were two episodes - second hour seemed disjointed, and maybe we needed a week. I'm with you on the character assessments and the tie to religion. Didn't Suresh look like BrundelFly, especially pulling the gunk from his shoulder? climbing up the wall? Those were direct pulls from The Fly :)
Hi Cindy,
Enjoy your Tweets on Twitter. Would love to join in the "I see what you say" shout out, but I am not sure how to do that. Anybody else in Rockford do a blog? If I am listening to you in the morning and tweet you, will you be able to get it while on the air? Mike Logan (michaelslogan on Twitter) My blog is http://www.askmikethecounselor.com
Cindy, Thanks once again for the news of Sandra Byrd new book.
I'll be reading it as soon as a finish Jean Plaidy - Madame Serpent.
Post a Comment